ASPS®
Patient Consultation Resource Book
1 of 7
Smoking and Plastic Surgery
Mark L. Jewell, M.D.
Introduction
In most medical situations, the effects of tobacco are considered
primarily with respect to its production of disease states or
neoplasia. Virtually all organ systems including the unborn are
affected by exposure to tobacco. Within the specialty of surgery,
smoking can dramatically influence the goal of uncomplicated wound
healing 1-8.
The specialty of plastic surgery places great emphasis on both surgical
techniques and treatments that promote normal wound healing in order to
produce a superior surgical outcome. It has been observed and reported
within a variety of different surgical scenarios that smokers have
impaired capacity for wound repair and propensity for skin necrosis.
Smoking appears to be a major complicator of surgical procedures, in
addition to other known potential risk factors. To this date, it is
poorly addressed during informed-consent discussions with patients
prior to surgical procedures. The effects of smoking on experimental
flap survival have been extensively studied in laboratory animal models
9.
Both cosmetic and reconstructive surgical procedures have been noted to
be adversely affected by smoking. These include: rhytidectomy 10,42,
abdominoplasty 11, reduction mammaplasty, breast reconstruction 12-16,
free-tissue transfer 17-20, 47, flaps 21-23, grafts 24, and digital
replantation 25-26.
Surgery performed in areas of the head where there
is a robust blood supply experienced an eight-fold increase in wound
healing complications over non-smoking controls 6. Smoking can impair
bone healing and lower extremity wounds 27-33.
It is relatively simple to identify a history of smoking during history
taking in a non-confrontational manner as it relates to the general
health of your patient. It becomes somewhat more difficult to
communicate with a smoking patient that this activity places them at an
unacceptable level of risk for preventable surgical complications. To
many patients, complications following a surgical procedure are not
very tangible. Patients seem to place great faith in the wonders of
modern medicine to shield them from surgical morbidity and mortality.
Often there is minimal patient insight that activities such as smoking
could produce devastating complications. Most patients are intolerant
of complications and tend to project blame towards the operating
surgeon versus accepting that their smoking has contributed in any
meaningful manner. Within this context, it is certainly easier to avoid
a devastating complication by refusing to operate on actively smoking
patients due to unacceptable risk or require a designated period of
complete abstinence from smoking prior to surgery.
Elective
Cosmetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery
Within the scenario of elective major cosmetic or reconstructive
surgery the plastic surgeon certainly has time to discuss with the
smoking patient their increased risk of skin necrosis, delayed wound
healing, and potential for a poor result. It is additionally possible
to identify and address the relevance of other known factors that
produce wound healing problems such as diabetes mellitus, chronic
steroid use, malnutrition, and prior radiation therapy. Control over
patient situations involving elective surgery as to whether or not you
choose to operate on any high-risk patient, faced with the increased
risk of surgical complications and poor outcome are certainly possible.
Document within your chart notes that you have counseled the patient
regarding increased risk of potential complications due to smoking and
surgery. Also document your decision with respect to how you choose to
manage this issue prior to surgery. This helps avoid a challenge from a
plaintiff’s attorney alleging that the surgeon knew of the
potential for complications due to smoking, yet failed to act in a
prudent fashion to prevent these by either advising the patient of
increased risk or not performing surgery.
I have found it useful also to address the issue of financial
responsibility for expense of treating complications, should they
occur.
Patients may take this matter more
seriously if you can portray to them the nature of delayed wound
healing or skin necrosis in terms of revisionary surgery, wound
debridement, scarring, and emotional distress from a poor surgical
result. At the same time, you can certainly become their advocate for
offering hope that they can undergo elective cosmetic or reconstructive
surgery in the future once they have stopped smoking.
There does not appear to be a consensus regarding how long a smoker
should wait to undergo surgery, once they have completely stopped
smoking. Within my personal practice, I generally use an arbitrary time
of 6 weeks for major cosmetic or reconstructive surgery. This amount of
time for a smoker to be away from tobacco is certainly achievable by
motivated patients who really want to stop smoking in order to diminish
risk factors attributable to smoking. It allows ample time for the
patient to succeed at the difficult task of smoking cessation through
behavior modification or pharmacological means. This amount of time
appears adequate in ferreting out those who lack motivation to stop
smoking before surgery.
Although it may be possible to successfully operate on smokers by
varying surgical technique such as a deep plane facelift or skin-only
facelift with minimal undermining, this approach cannot be applied to
other areas of the body where flaps of skin and other tissues are
involved. The results from minimized procedures on smokers may not meet
their expectations for results when compared with more standard
approaches.
Urgent / Emergency Surgery
Situations where “urgent” or
“emergency” surgery is needed does not offer the
smoking patient adequate time to stop smoking before surgery. The
surgeon is faced with the dilemma of having to perform surgery in a
situation of combined risk from both the urgent condition/trauma and
the effects of smoking.
“Urgent” situations occur, such as a smoking
patient with a positive breast biopsy for invasive cancer, who requests
an immediate TRAM flap breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy
that is scheduled in three days time. Given this scenario, the patient
may already have strong expectations for an immediate reconstruction.
The consultation with such a demanding patient can be quite
challenging. You literally will have to re-educate her with respect to
increased risk of delayed wound healing complications from both the
primary procedure, the mastectomy 34, not to mention a >4 hour
autologous tissue reconstruction. She may not be a suitable risk for
any type of an immediate breast reconstruction due to her smoking.
The prudent course of action in this situation may be to just say
“no”.
Recommend that the patient set a quit date, seek support from
friends, family, and coworkers, and remove cigarettes from home and
work. A proposed surgical procedure that is desired by a patient such
as a reduction mammaplasty or rhytidectomy certainly gives a reason to
stop smoking.
•
ARRANGE
Despite the fact that we are surgeons and do no manage smoking
cessation as part of our practice, the reality of the situation is that
we are at risk to mange the complications of smoking after surgery.
Patients often appreciate your interest in their situation if you offer
referral to a cessation specialist, counselor, or support group. Make a
follow-up visit to congratulate success in order to reinforce the
importance of cessation of smoking prior to surgery.
For example, you can address this issue with your patients by saying,
“As your surgeon, I need you to understand that quitting
smoking is one of the most important things that you can do to protect
your current and future health.” Although most patients
intellectually agree that smoking is a hazard to one’s health
and wound healing, the practical aspects of stopping smoking are
difficult to master.
Some patients will attempt to bargain with their surgeon in terms of,
“Will you do my surgery if I just cut down to one or two
cigarettes a day?” Other patients may just tell their surgeon
that they have stopped smoking, yet continue surreptitiously (closet
smokers). Nicotine is highly addictive and patients may exhibit a
variety of behavioral responses when they try to stop smoking.
Verify
that your patient affirms that they have stopped smoking prior to
surgery and will not resume smoking during the post-operative period.
I believe that total absistence from smoking is necessary prior to
major cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. Although nicotine patches
and gum may be of some benefit to reduce craving for cigarettes 35,
these items are still a source for an agent that has been implicated in
producing delayed wound healing and skin necrosis. The effect of
nicotine patches on wound healing has not been investigated.
Other types of medications such as Zyban (bupropion) may be of benefit
in helping curb nicotine addiction 36-40. Zyban may offer a theoretical
advantage for surgical patients over nicotine preparations as this
approach does not rely upon the addictive agent (nicotine) for smoking
cessation. Successful cessation of smoking in patients can be a
challenging experience. This may require a variety of approaches from
both a behavioral and pharmacological standpoint. There is a high
incidence of recidivism in patients who attempt to stop smoking. Make
certain that your message to your patients is that you require complete
absistence from tobacco and nicotine during the peri-operative period.
I have found it helpful to enlist the assistance of other physicians
who deal with the medical management of smoking cessation and behavior
modification. This approach of using other physicians or support groups
to help patients successfully stop smoking is a good strategy. It
allows the smoker to receive ample care and support by medical
personnel that are experienced in dealing with smoking cessation.
Minimum abstention time from nicotine and reversal of nicotine-induced
wound healing risks
There has not been a controlled study that demonstrates a specific
minimum time for the reversal of nicotine-induced wound healing risks
when exposure to nicotine ceases46. Nicotine exposure can occur in
non-smoking ways through trans-dermal patches, nicotine-containing gum,
nasal spray, or smokeless tobacco products in patients who
“no longer smoke”.
Please indicate your
current status regarding these items below:
_________I am a non-smoker and do not use nicotine products. I
understand the potential risk of second-hand smoke exposure.
_________I am a smoker or use tobacco / nicotine products.
Date:___________________________
Signature:_____________________________________________
Conclusion
Total absistence from smoking during the peri-operative period still
remains the best course of management in order to reduce the negative
effects of smoking on wound healing and propensity towards skin
necrosis. Unfortunately, there does not exist any magic pill or
treatment otherwise that will serve as an antidote for the effects of
smoking on surgical wounds 41.
Although we as physicians seek to please our patients by following
their requests for elective cosmetic or reconstructive surgery, avoid
becoming trapped in going forth with surgery on a smoking patient
because you do not want to anger them with respect to addressing the
issue of their smoking. As a surgeon, you certainly have the upper hand
both with respect to knowledge of increased risk that smoking plays in
surgical complications and control with respect to choice in your
decision to operate on this patient. A visual aid of an abdominoplasty
flap in a smoker that has undergone a full thickness slough and remains
unhealed 8 weeks after surgery due to subdermal fat necrosis represents
a graphic patient education tool that will help a patient understand
the magnitude of nicotine-induced wound healing problems.
Although there is intense competition for major cosmetic or
reconstructive cases, avoid compromising your good surgical judgment by
operating on smokers due to economic considerations. Don’t
assume unnecessary risk by failing to ignore the potential for demise
in performing surgery on smokers. In such a situation, you literally
cannot afford to operate from the perspective of your future economic
costs of follow up care for complication management and expected free
revisionary surgery to “make it right”.
Plastic & Reconstuctive Surgery. 93(5):980-7, 1994 Apr.
6. Jones JK. Triplett RG.
The relationship of cigarette smoking to impaired intraoral wound
healing: a review of evidence and implications for patient care.
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 50(3):237-9;
discussion 239-40, 1992 Mar.
7. Silverstein P.
Smoking and wound healing. [Review] [ 10 refs]
American Journal of Medicine. 93(1A):22S-24S, 1992 Jul 15
8. Jensen JA. Goodson WH. Hopf HW. Hunt TK
Cigarette smoking decreases tissue oxygen.
Archives of surgery. 126(9):1131-4, 1991 Sep.
9. Nolan. J., Jenkins, R., Kurihara, K., Schultz, R.
The Acute Effects of Cigarette Smoke Exposure on Experimental Skin
Flaps
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 75(4):544-49, April 1985.
10. Netscher DT. Clamon J.
Smoking: adverse effects on outcomes for plastic surgical patients.
Plastic Surgical Nursing. 14(4):205-10, 1994 Winter.
11. Kroll SS.
Necrosis of abdominoplasty and other secondary flaps after TRAM flap
breast reconstruction.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 94(5):637-43, 1994 Oct
12. Takeishi M. Shaw WW. Ahn CY. Corud LJ.
TRAM flaps in patients with abdominal scars
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 99(3):713-22,1997 Mar
13. Banic A. Boeckx W. Greulich M. Guelickx P. Marchi A. Rigitti G.
Tschopp H.
Late results of breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps: a
prospective multicentric study.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 95(7):1195-204; discussion
1205-6, 1995 Jun.
14. Watterson PA. Bostwick J 3rd. Hester TR Jr. Bried JT. Taylor GI.
TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10-year clinical experience with
556 patients (see comments).
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 95(7):1185-94, 1995 Jun.
15. Jacobsen WM. Meland NB. Woods JE.
Autologous breast reconstruction with use of transverse rectus
abdominis musculocutaneous flap: Mayo clinic experience with 147 cases.
Clinical and experimental studies.
Chinese Medical Journal. 106(9):682-7, 1993 Sep.
26. Van Adrichem LN. Hovius SE. van Strik R. van der Meulen JC.
Acute effects of cigarette smoking on microcirculation of the thumb.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 45 (1):9-11, 1992 Jan.
27. Haverstock BD. Mandracchia VJ
Cigarette smoking and bone healing: implications in foot and ankle
surgery.
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery. 37(1):69-74; discussion 78,
1998 Jan-Feb.
28. Marsh DR. Shah S. Elliott J. Kurdy N.
The Ilizarov method in nonunion, malunion and infection of fractures.
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery – British Volume.
79(2):273-9, 1997 Mar.
29. Gualdrini G d. Zati A. Degli Esposti S.
The effects of cigarette smoke on the progression of septic
pseudarthrosis of the tibia treated by Ilizarov external fixator.
Chirurgia Degli Organi di Movimento. 81(4):395-400 hl, 1996 Sep-Dec.
30. Kwiatkowski TC. Hanley EN Jr. Ramp WK
Cigarette smoking and its orthopedic consequences. [Review] [112 refs]
American Journal of Orthopedics. 25(9):590-7, 1996 Sep.
31. Whitesides TE Jr. Hanley EN Jr. Fellrath RF Jr.
Smoking abstinence. Is it necessary before spinal fusion?
Spine. 19(17):2012-4, 1994 Sep 1.
32. Lind J. Kramhoft, M. Bodtker S.
The influence of smoking on complications after primary amputations of
the lower extremity.
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, (267):211-7, 1991
Jun.
33. Sherwin MA. Gastwirth CM.
Detrimental effects of cigarette smoking on lower extremity wound
healing. [Review] [12 refs]
Journal of Foot Surgery. 29(1):84-7, 1990 Jan-Feb.
34. Vinton AL. Traverso LW. Jolly PC.
Wound complications after modified radical mastectomy compared with
tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection.
American Journal of Surgery. 161(5):584-8, 1991 May .
35. Hughes JR.
Risk-benefit assessment of nicotine preparations in smoking cessation.
[Review] [43 refs]
Drug Safety. 8(1):49-56, 1993 Jan.
36. Hurt, R.D. and Others
A Comparison of Sustained Release Bupropion and Placebo for Smoking
Cessation
New England Journal of Medicine. 337(17): 1195-1202, 1997 October 23.
37.
Benowitz, N.L.
Treating Nicotine Addiction- Nicotine or No Nicotine?
New England Journal of Medicine. 337(17): 1230-31, 1997 October 23.
38.
Goldstein, Michael, G.
Bupropion Sustained Release and Smoking Cessation
J Clinical Psychiatry. 59(Suppl 4): 66-72, 1998:59.
39.
Settle, Edmund C., Jr.
Bupropion Sustained Release:Side Effect Profile
J Clinical Psychiatry. 59(Suppl 4): 342-36, 1998:59.
40.
Davidson, Jonathan , Connor, Kathryn, M.
Bupropion Sustained Release: A Theraupeutic Overview
J Clinical Psychiatry. 59(Suppl 4): 25-31, 1998:59.
41.
Davies, Brian, Lewis, Robert, Pennington, Gary
The Impact of Vasodilators on Random-Pattern Skin Flap Survival in the
Rat Following Mainstream Smoke Exposure
Annals of Plastic Surgery. 40(6): 630-6, 1998
42.
Rees, Thomas, Liverett, David, Guy, Cary
The Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Skin-Flap Survival in the Face Lift
Patient
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 73(6):911-915, 1984
43.
Manassa, Edouard, Hertl, Catherine, Olbrisch, Rolf-Ruediger,
Wound Healing Problems in Smokers and Nonsmokers after 132
abdominoplasties
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 116(6):2082-2087:2003.
44.
Rohrich, Rod, Coberty, Dana, Discussion: Wound Healing Problems in
Smokers and Nonsmokers after 132 abdominoplasties
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 116(6):2088-2089:2003.
45.
Gorney, Mark, Martello, Jeanette, The Genesis of Plastic Surgery
Claims,
Clinics in Plastic Surgery 26:1:123-131:1999
46
Rohrich, Rod, Coberly, Dana,Krueger, Jeffrey, Brown, Spencer, Planning
Elective Operations on Patients Who Smoke: Survey of North American
Plastic Surgeons
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: 109:1:350-355:2002.
47. Chang, Lawrence, Buncke, Greg, Slezak, Sheri, Buncke, Harry,
Cigarette Smoking, Plastic Surgery, and Microsurgery.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery: 12:7: 467-474:1996
48.
Rohrich, Rod, Cosmetic Surgery and Patients Who Smoke: Should We
Operate?,
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: June 2000, 137-138.
49.
Rosenthal, Jeffrey, The Responsibility of Plastic Surgeons To Help
Patients Stop Smoking,
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Letter to the Editor, 109:3
1201-1202,:2002
50.
Rayatt, Sukh, Smoking and Elective Surgery: A Survey of United Kingdom
Plastic Surgery Consultants
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Letter to the Editor:114:2 605-606:
2004.
51.
Krueger, Jeffrey, Rohrich, Rod, Clearing the Smoke: The Scientific
Rationale for Tobacco Abstention with Plastic Surgery
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: 108:4: 1063-1075 (includes
discussion by Tom Mustoe, M.D.) 2001.
52.
Akoz, Tayfun, Akan, Mithat, Yidirim, Serkan, If You Continue to Smoke,
We May Have a Problem:Smoking Effects on Plastic Surgery,
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: 26:477-482, 2002.
53.
Ziegler, Ulrich, Kauczok, Jens, Dietz, Ulrich Andreas, Reith, H. Bernd,
Schmidt, Karsten, Clinical Correlation Between the Consumption of
nicotine and Continine Concentrations in Urine and Serum by Competitive
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,
Pharmacology: 72:254-259:2004. blog